<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberPress Official Statement: Being Unfair to Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/</link>
	<description>Technology &#124; Publishing &#124; Games &#124; New Media &#124; Philippines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lycan</title>
		<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-172812</link>
		<dc:creator>lycan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abuggedlife.com/?p=4962#comment-172812</guid>
		<description>From Ms. Rina Jimenez David . . 

&quot;Maybe it was just bad timing, because months earlier it had been announced that the various business sections would be merged and all correspondents would no longer be asked to contribute. But still, Cyberpress doesn’t look kindly on the way events have unfolded.&quot;

Here&#039;s the link to the article.

http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20100330-261549/Taking-part-in-Earth-Hour</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Ms. Rina Jimenez David . . </p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe it was just bad timing, because months earlier it had been announced that the various business sections would be merged and all correspondents would no longer be asked to contribute. But still, Cyberpress doesn’t look kindly on the way events have unfolded.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link to the article.</p>
<p><a href="http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20100330-261549/Taking-part-in-Earth-Hour" rel="nofollow">http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20100330-261549/Taking-part-in-Earth-Hour</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitzi</title>
		<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-172693</link>
		<dc:creator>mitzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abuggedlife.com/?p=4962#comment-172693</guid>
		<description>the real issue is what did HP and the PR company do to pressure MB to close down the page? that&#039;s the problem. With the aid of the PR company, HP branded the story as false (when in fact it is true in its totality) leading MB to appease HP by penalizing the page. thats the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the real issue is what did HP and the PR company do to pressure MB to close down the page? that&#8217;s the problem. With the aid of the PR company, HP branded the story as false (when in fact it is true in its totality) leading MB to appease HP by penalizing the page. thats the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRprof.</title>
		<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-172692</link>
		<dc:creator>PRprof.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abuggedlife.com/?p=4962#comment-172692</guid>
		<description>Duh? What a stupid comment. How would the editor or the reporter know there was something wrong with the article if the Company or the PR did not inform them in the first place? Now, if the two didn&#039;t get any info, then why should they ask the PR or IT company about anything at all? The reason the PR company and the IT company is in deep shit here, it&#039;s all because of the basic protocol and simple courtesy to the journalists to be informed first about a questionable article, which the two apparently ignored. That is basic PR 101. Obviously you know the story because you mentioned MB. MB can do whatever they want with their employees. I don&#039;t think you&#039;re intelligent enough to understand what went wrong here. So, there&#039; no point explaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh? What a stupid comment. How would the editor or the reporter know there was something wrong with the article if the Company or the PR did not inform them in the first place? Now, if the two didn&#8217;t get any info, then why should they ask the PR or IT company about anything at all? The reason the PR company and the IT company is in deep shit here, it&#8217;s all because of the basic protocol and simple courtesy to the journalists to be informed first about a questionable article, which the two apparently ignored. That is basic PR 101. Obviously you know the story because you mentioned MB. MB can do whatever they want with their employees. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re intelligent enough to understand what went wrong here. So, there&#8217; no point explaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EY</title>
		<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-172631</link>
		<dc:creator>EY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abuggedlife.com/?p=4962#comment-172631</guid>
		<description>Its not the fault of the PR agency or the IT company
if the paper itself wanted the section abolished in the first place. So why go after the PR and IT company when the real issue here is that MB dont want them anymore. Inside scoop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not the fault of the PR agency or the IT company<br />
if the paper itself wanted the section abolished in the first place. So why go after the PR and IT company when the real issue here is that MB dont want them anymore. Inside scoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lycan</title>
		<link>http://abuggedlife.com/2010/03/12/cyberpress-official-statement-being-unfair-to-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-172622</link>
		<dc:creator>lycan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abuggedlife.com/?p=4962#comment-172622</guid>
		<description>. The veteran IT journalists involved have always kept an open line of communication to both IT company and PR agency but were never approached.

isn&#039;t it the job of  the veteran it journalist to have contacted the company or pr if there was an open communication in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>. The veteran IT journalists involved have always kept an open line of communication to both IT company and PR agency but were never approached.</p>
<p>isn&#8217;t it the job of  the veteran it journalist to have contacted the company or pr if there was an open communication in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

