Comments on: UPDATED: Playboy Philippines First Issue: A lesson in being remarkable?

By: e-business components

e-business components — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:12:34 +0000

Fácilmente, el puesto es lo mejor que sobre este tema que merecería. Yo armonicen con sus conclusiones y sediento se espera de sus futuras actualizaciones. Simplemente decir gracias no sólo será suficiente, para la gran lucidez en su escritura. De inmediato le toma el feed RSS para estar al tanto de cualquier actualización. De luminosas de trabajo y mucho éxito en su negocio Enterprize!

By: The Lady Prism

The Lady Prism — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:07:59 +0000

True! True! I wanted to pick up a first issue copy for my husband ( surprise bah’) but when I saw the cover…I was soooooo too shocked..like total bewilderment…

I just stood there holding the copy, scanning its cover thinking I picked up Good Housekeeping by mistake!

By: as it falls

as it falls — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:36:10 +0000

let’s all just agree that Playboy Philippines would be better off as packaging in a fish market.

i tried wiping my butt with it… but the paper cuts were just too much! OUCH!

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 07 May 2008 18:14:32 +0000

If a guy says he buys these magazines for those articles, he’s lying. Make no mistake, the articles may be good, but these write-ups do not sell Playboy, FHM, or whatever male-oriented publication you can think of.

They merely bolster the magazine’s overall worth.

Men won’t admit outright that they bought a naughty magazine for the mammaries, but rest assured–they really did.

By: Frances

Frances — Tue, 06 May 2008 17:04:24 +0000

You guys are so funny, typing titties all the time =P So men buy the lad mags for the breast and nipple thrills? So it’s really not true that the articles are actually good?

My dad used to say that but he refused to show me these fabulous articles. My husband was all too willing and gave me a Playboy US (emphasis on the US, okay?) to leaf through. I then believed the excuse because the articles truly were amazing.

And then I read your exchange here and find that it really boils down to the titties! So funny =D

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 02 May 2008 17:03:08 +0000

Ryan is correct. Titties. Deny it all you want, but men buy FHM for titties. To suggest otherwise is hypocritical.

Ryan’s point about the quality of titties is also correct. I would like to add that it’s not just the inherent quality of the titties; the magazine’s photography also contributes to the overall caliber of FHM, thus its dominance in the market.

Playboy Philippines is destined to die out early if it does not live up to the original U.S. version’s legacy (i.e. quality titties). We’ve known for years that the mere mention of the words “Playboy Magazine” already implies tastefully-photographed bare titties.

And you know what? I was looking for comments regarding titty quality in Jayvee’s review of the maiden (pun intended) issue but there was no mention whatsoever. Look bro, I understand that you want to remain objective and inoffensive (particularly to the ladies in the house), but if you’re going to review a magazine known for titties, you’re going to have tell us guys (the publication’s target audience) the quality of the titties in the issue that you’re reviewing.

Men are not interested in details regarding the ads. Only industry insiders are interested in the ads. Men want to know about the titties. So let me ask again: How are the titties?

By: drei

drei — Thu, 01 May 2008 18:06:33 +0000

“First of all, I do not have any obligation to you, or to anyone here, so I could not care any less if you’re satisfied with my answers or not.”

looks like you conceded here…

By: Bim

Bim — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:29:05 +0000

Not that I’m supporting Ryan here or anything, but I will tell you why I buy FHM and why I bought the first Playboy PH issue- to look at the pictures of tits and jack off onto the pages.

I’m not trying to be gross here or anything, and yes, it’s easier to just download porn. I have 40 gigs of porn on my drive. But all I’m saying is that yes, there is a market for tits. ME. I like celebrity tits. I like jacking off to celebrity tits, because I’m damn sure that’s the closest I can come to celebrity tits.

I like celebrity tits. People like me like celebrity tits. There’s a market in it for celebrity tits. Similarly, there’s a market who’d rather jack off to internet porn, and buy FHM to read about Asia’s sexcapades and jack off to that.

Sex sells. It’s a tried and tested marketing strategy.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:27:04 +0000

Why do people put smilies at the end of their sentences if they’re just going to be rude?

If you’re gonna cop out, just admit to it, don’t hide behind some bullshit reason like “giving away info” and not having obligations to anyone.

It says a lot about a person when they admit to being wrong, and when they find every way under the sun to avoid admitting it.

And for fuck’s sake of course there are classifications for titty. For example Mahal’s titty < Assunta’s titty.

By: Alvin

Alvin — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:08:05 +0000

Jayvee,

I can understand the apprehension. If Summit didn’t fund it, there simply is no other way. I doubt if all the publishing companies would agree to sharing the expenses of doing such a survey.

Anyways, I think in the 08′ media kit, Synovate information is used already.